Share this article:
Print

CPS Energy awaits estimate for plant; $17 billion tag feared

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by Chris Sadeghi / KENS 5

Posted on November 16, 2009 at 7:07 PM

Updated Tuesday, Nov 17 at 8:24 AM

******

CPS Energy executives went to Japan to tell contractors they will not accept a significant cost increase to build a new power plant as a part of the South Texas Project expansion. The board of trustees was briefed on the trip at a meeting on Monday.

“As promised, we delivered a clear message from our community to the general contractor and constructor that we will not accept a significant cost-estimate increase to build new nuclear-fueled electrical generating units,” said CPS Energy Interim General Manager Steve Bartley. 

Toshiba -- the general contractor for the project -- will have until December 31 to offer an estimate on the project. Speculation at the meeting was cost for the power plant could reach $17 billion. Once an estimate is received, CPS Energy will have until January 15th to decide whether to move forward or abandon the project.

CPS says they want the most reliable and affordable way to provide energy. However, the Energia Mia opposes the proposed expansion and says the city should look at other solutions.

“We still do not have a cost on the expansion, we still do not have a plan for nuclear waste, we still do not need it.” said Energia Mia member and former city councilmember Maria Berriozabal

CPS Energy trustee Stephen Hennigan says the dynamics of a proposed deal still need to be questioned and carefully looked over, but he is confident a plant will be built.

“I am optimistic the Japanese will provide a plant and provide power in Texas.  The matter is if we (the city of San Antonio) are going to participate.”

 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

boppinsa said on November 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM

we don't need another nuclear plant. we need to be more green rather than leave a mess for our children to deal with because of our irresponsibility. you don't need to keep the thermostat at 70 in summer and 80 in winter to be comfortable. we're just spoiled. when i went to window units, i cut my electric bill in half. unless somebody is in a room, it doesn't get cooled. only takes a few minutes for window units to cool a room down, so there's no need to keep it running while everybody's at school and work. why not make builders make homes that offer cross ventilation like they did in the days before air conditioning so we can turn them off at night when the weather is cool? not 1 of my 3 bedrooms has it. i hate to see california intrude on people's personal freedom by telling citizens they can't have those huge flat screen tvs, but an extra tax can be levied on high energy use appliances to discourage folks from buying them. we could use the tax money to put solar on govt buildings.

32239566
Flag this comment

boppinsa said on November 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM

i just called my councilman's office to see how he feels about nuclear energy and was told that he hasn't informed his office workers of his views. if you're out there mr. justin rodrigues, your constituents have a right to know your views. when i was in mr. williams' precinct, i had no problem getting that info from his office.

32241554
Flag this comment